AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1724 vs 1680
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1724 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 vs 1680 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 1715
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 1177
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 1715
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 1177
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1500 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 vs 1177 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 1715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 vs 1177 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | 8429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | 1825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 | 1680 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 700 | 701 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4200
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs
IntelArc Pro A40
