AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA Quadro K5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 706 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4654 vs 3987
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23264 vs 11444
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 31.318
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 681.141
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 3.062
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 32.922
• 9.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 67.311

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K5000

• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 300 Watt
• 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1704 MHz
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 440 vs 338
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6288 vs 1715
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3680 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 1724
• 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6288 vs 1715
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3680 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4654 3987
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 440
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23264 11444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.628 31.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1762.559 681.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.26 3.062
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.313 32.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	617.099 67.311
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 6288
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3352

Compare specifications (specs)