AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 625 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 2.6x more memory clock speed: 1704 MHz vs 666 MHz
- 19.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4979 vs 251
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 249
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 3 September 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz vs 666 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 vs 251 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 249 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 300 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4979 | 251 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 249 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23543 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1177 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1724 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | GT216 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 3 September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 668 | 671 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 32 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 486 million |
Floating-point performance | 130.56 gflops | |
Pipelines | 48 | |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 666 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 10.66 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3 |