AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 944 MHz
• Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 950 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4654 vs 3825
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23264 vs 14467
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 102.628 vs 67.59
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1762.559 vs 720.592
• Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.26 vs 3.903
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.313 vs 57.947
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 617.099 vs 223.296

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

• 6x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 300 Watt
• Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1704 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 347 vs 338
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5783 vs 1715
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2566 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 1724
• 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5783 vs 1715
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2566 vs 1177
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 1724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4654 3825
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	338 347
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	23264 14467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.628 67.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1762.559 720.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.26 3.903
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.313 57.947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	617.099 223.296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1715 5783
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1177 2566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3337

Compare specifications (specs)