Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 1715
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 1715
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1177
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1177
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1724
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 vs 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
- 4.7x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3751 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3751 | 1715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 1177 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 1724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 1724 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4654 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 338 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23264 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 102.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1762.559 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.26 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 86.313 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 617.099 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 681 | 682 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.25 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.12 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR4 | |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin |