Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) and AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 12x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 300 Watt
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3751 vs 1715
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3751 vs 1715
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1177
  • 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1177
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1724
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1724
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 300 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 vs 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 1724

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

  • 4.7x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1500 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3751
1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
1177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
1724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
1724
Name Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3751 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3751 1715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 1177
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 1724
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 1724
PassMark - G3D Mark 4654
PassMark - G2D Mark 338
Geekbench - OpenCL 23264
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 102.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1762.559
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 86.313
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 617.099

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Essentials

Architecture Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) GCN 5.0
Code name Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11 Vega 10
Launch date 28 May 2019 27 June 2017
Place in performance rating 681 682
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1500 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.25 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1.12 TFLOPS
Pipelines 64
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt 300 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Memory type DDR4
Shared memory Yes
Memory clock speed 1704 MHz

Technologies

Quick Sync

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin