AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and ATI Radeon HD 4270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 102.4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 512 MB
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 1 May 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 590 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 40 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4270
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | ATI Radeon HD 4270 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68562 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 110 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 303 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | ATI Radeon HD 4270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RV6xx |
| Code name | Vega 10 | RS880M |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 1 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 562 | 564 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 590 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |
| Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
| HDCP support | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 | ||
