AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs AMD FirePro W5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and AMD FirePro W5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 9.7x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 768
- 9.7x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,267 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 300 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 4308
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 4308
- 6.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68562 vs 9969
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 7 August 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 1,267 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 vs 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 vs 4308 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68562 vs 9969 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W5000
- Around 88% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 1634
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1846
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1846
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 1634 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1846 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | AMD FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68562 | 9969 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2989 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 771.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.758 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 7 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 562 | 563 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 768 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 2 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 183 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Half Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 with others
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4270
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
AMDFirePro W5000
AMDRadeon Instinct MI25 vs
NVIDIAP104-100
