AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1290 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 6.6x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 640
- 6.6x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67679 vs 17478
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1290 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 1,862 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67679 vs 17478 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1704 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 6958
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 6958
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1634
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1634
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 1846
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 1846
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1704 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 6958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 6958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1634 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 1846 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6958 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6958 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1634 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1634 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1846 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1846 | 3360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67679 | 17478 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5036 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 10 | GP107 |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 588 | 589 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 482.8 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1704 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |