AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA Quadro M2000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 796 MHz
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1163 MHz
6.8x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
5.3x more pipelines: 4096 vs 768
6.8x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6958 vs 5523
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6958 vs 5523
4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67679 vs 14526

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 June 2017 vs 8 April 2016
Core clock speed	1400 MHz vs 796 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz vs 1163 MHz
Texture fill rate	384.0 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
Pipelines	4096 vs 768
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6958 vs 5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6958 vs 5523
Geekbench - OpenCL	67679 vs 14526

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000

4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 300 Watt
3.9x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1704 MHz
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1634
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1634
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3325 vs 1846
Around 80% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3325 vs 1846

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 300 Watt
Memory clock speed	6612 MHz vs 1704 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3684 vs 1634
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3684 vs 1634
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3325 vs 1846
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3325 vs 1846

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6958

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6958

5523

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1634

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1634

3684

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1846

3325

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1846

3325

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

67679

14526

Name	AMD Radeon Instinct MI25	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6958	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6958	5523
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1634	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1634	3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1846	3325
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1846	3325
Geekbench - OpenCL	67679	14526
PassMark - G3D Mark		3995
PassMark - G2D Mark		563
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		55.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		639.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		225.868

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Instinct MI25	NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Vega 10	GM206
Launch date	27 June 2017	8 April 2016
Place in performance rating	581	590
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$437.75
Price now		$409.99
Value for money (0-100)		13.23
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1163 MHz
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	796 MHz
Floating-point performance	12,288 gflops	1,812 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	4096	768
Texture fill rate	384.0 GTexel / s	56.64 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	12,500 million	2,940 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	201 mm
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	482.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1704 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	128 Bit
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management