AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 275 MHz
- 17.7x more texture fill rate: 39.01 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- 11.9x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 590 MHz
- 18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1871 vs 102
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 223
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 25 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s vs 2.2 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 590 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1871 vs 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 vs 223 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1871 | 102 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 387 | 223 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.848 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 438.581 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.268 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Lexa | NV41 |
Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 25 February 2005 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Place in performance rating | 818 | 815 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 275 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 2.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-III |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | 18.88 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 590 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |