AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 14% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 811 MHz
• Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 2000 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 387 vs 341
• Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10293 vs 8613
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 29.528
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 42.15
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 87.659
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3331
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3651
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3331

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 63.76 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,530 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2800 vs 1871
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 731.755 vs 438.581
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.486 vs 2.268
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4133 vs 3241
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4133 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1871 2800
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	387 341
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10293 8613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 29.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 731.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 2.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 42.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 87.659
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3331
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 4133
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 3331

Compare specifications (specs)