AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
Around 54% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 600 MHz
Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,248 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 15% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 75 Watt
5x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 402 vs 326
Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10229 vs 5980
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.848 vs 20.831

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	12 June 2017 vs 1 October 2012
Core clock speed	925 MHz vs 600 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops vs 1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz vs 1400 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	402 vs 326
Geekbench - OpenCL	10229 vs 5980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848 vs 20.831
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709 vs 3698

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 48.0 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Around 88% higher pipelines: 960 vs 512
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1947 vs 1832
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3396 vs 3241
Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3396 vs 3241

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.0 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Pipelines	960 vs 512
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1947 vs 1832
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3396 vs 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3396 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1832

1947

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

402

326

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10229

5980

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

30.848

20.831

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3241

3396

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3709

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

Name	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
PassMark - G3D Mark	1832	1947
PassMark - G2D Mark	402	326
Geekbench - OpenCL	10229	5980
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	30.848	20.831
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	139.235
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3241	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3709	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3241	3396
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3709	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Lexa	GK104
Launch date	12 June 2017	1 October 2012
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	804	818
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1219 MHz
Core clock speed	925 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,248 gflops	1,154 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	512	960
Texture fill rate	39.01 GTexel / s	48.0 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	2,200 million	3,540 million
CUDA cores		960
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	56 GB / s	67.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	7000 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
FXAA
SLI
TXAA