AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 and AMD Radeon HD 7790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 988
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2061
• 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 988
• Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2061

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7790

• Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz
• Around 44% higher texture fill rate: 56 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 896 vs 512
• Around 44% better floating-point performance: 1,792 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3090 vs 1832
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 459 vs 402
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14832 vs 10229
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.749 vs 30.848
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 828.247 vs 438.581
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.631 vs 2.268
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 63.284 vs 46.988
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 217.744 vs 139.235
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5087 vs 3241
• Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5087 vs 3241

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1832 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	402 459
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10229 14832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.848 40.749
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	438.581 828.247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.268 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	46.988 63.284
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	139.235 217.744
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 2061
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3241 5087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3709 988
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3350 2061

Compare specifications (specs)