AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs AMD Radeon E8950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and AMD Radeon E8950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 vs 29 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E8950
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- 3.3x better floating-point performance: 4,096 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 vs 29.959
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 vs 864.134
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 vs 2.893
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 vs 49.305
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 vs 122.245
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops vs 1,248 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 vs 29.959 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 vs 864.134 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 vs 2.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 vs 49.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 vs 122.245 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E8950
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon E8950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2576 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 431 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10581 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 29.959 | 66.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 864.134 | 1369.722 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.893 | 6.633 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.305 | 65.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 122.245 | 326.391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3607 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3607 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 | AMD Radeon E8950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Lexa | Amethyst |
| Launch date | 12 June 2017 | 29 September 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Place in performance rating | 724 | 725 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1219 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 925 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 39.01 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Transistor count | 2,200 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | 192.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 with others
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIRadeon X300 SE
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 400
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
ATIRadeon X1650 PRO
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6850 X2
AMDRadeon PRO WX 3100 vs
AMDRadeon E8950
