AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 915 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1219 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• 1000x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.305 vs 45.894
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 122.245 vs 82.191
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4551 vs 3285
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3337
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4551 vs 3285
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3337

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• 2.6x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• 2.6x more pipelines: 1344 vs 512
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,248 gflops
• Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 2629
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 432
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 10611
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 29.959
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 864.134
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 2.893
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3607
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3607

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2629 4413
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	432 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	10611 15375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.959 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	864.134 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.893 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	49.305 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	122.245 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4551 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3607 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3337

Compare specifications (specs)