AMD Radeon Pro 455 vs AMD FirePro S9000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 455 and AMD FirePro S9000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 455

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 10x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 350 Watt
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 561
  • 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.484 vs 9.541
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 573.646 vs 275.278
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.854 vs 1.886
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 44.793 vs 30.049
  • Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 148.673 vs 91.842
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 October 2016 vs 24 August 2012
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 350 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 vs 561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.484 vs 9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 573.646 vs 275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.854 vs 1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.793 vs 30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 148.673 vs 91.842
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9000

  • Around 5% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 855 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
  • 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
  • 2.5x better floating-point performance: 3,226 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
  • Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5059 vs 3113
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 1762
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 1762
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 855 MHz
Texture fill rate 100.8 GTexel / s vs 41.04 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1792 vs 768
Floating-point performance 3,226 gflops vs 1,313 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 5500 MHz vs 5080 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5059 vs 3113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 1762
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 1762

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 455
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3113
5059
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
33.484
9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
573.646
275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.854
1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
44.793
30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
148.673
91.842
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1762
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1762
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3357
Name AMD Radeon Pro 455 AMD FirePro S9000
PassMark - G3D Mark 3113 5059
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 561
Geekbench - OpenCL 11544
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 33.484 9.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 573.646 275.278
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.854 1.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 44.793 30.049
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 148.673 91.842
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1762 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4146
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1762 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3357

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 455 AMD FirePro S9000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Baffin Tahiti
Launch date 30 October 2016 24 August 2012
Place in performance rating 694 696
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $2,499

Technical info

Core clock speed 855 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,313 gflops 3,226 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1792
Texture fill rate 41.04 GTexel / s 100.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 4,313 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count 1
Dual-link DVI support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.28 GB / s 264 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 5080 MHz 5500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0