AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7000 MHz
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 15 October 2018 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1168 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1284 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34584 vs 29361
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9258 vs 7730
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9258 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3595
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 594
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7663 vs 5955
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1168 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1284 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34584 vs 29361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9258 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9258 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3350 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 594 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7663 vs 5955 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 | 34584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 9258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3351 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3351 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 594 | 667 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5955 | 7663 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 122.268 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1890.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.008 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 625.621 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 849 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 15 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 368 | 365 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1284 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1168 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V8600
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
