AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 291.6x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 10008 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3333
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 2 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 10008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66950 vs 29361
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10841 vs 7730
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10841 vs 7730
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3696 vs 3595
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3696 vs 3595
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66950 vs 29361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10841 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10841 vs 7730 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3696 vs 3595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3696 vs 3595 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 29361 | 66950 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3333 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 594 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5955 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2368.267 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2244 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP102 |
Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 2 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 370 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Compute units | 20 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 |