AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 882.6x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 3260
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 617 vs 371
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 vs 371 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 7730
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 7730
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3595
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3595
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6284 vs 5996
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 7730 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3595 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3595 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 vs 5996 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 29471 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7730 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7730 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3595 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3595 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 3260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 617 | 371 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5996 | 6284 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 Nov 2019 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 354 | 356 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 200 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.400 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.200 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 100 GTexel/s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5300M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla M6
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIATesla P4
AMDRadeon Pro 5300M vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
