AMD Radeon Pro 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1178 MHz
917.4x more texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 148 Watt
1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29361 vs 28498

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	13 Nov 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 109 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 148 Watt
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	29361 vs 28498
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3340

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 30% higher pipelines: 1664 vs 1280
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 7730
Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 7730
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3595
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3595
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 587
Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9640 vs 5929

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Pipelines	1664 vs 1280
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11499 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11499 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 3595
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 3595
PassMark - G2D Mark	766 vs 587
PassMark - G3D Mark	9640 vs 5929

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

29361

28498

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

11499

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7730

11499

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3595

3698

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3340

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3350

3340

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

587

766

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5929

9640

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Geekbench - OpenCL	29361	28498
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7730	11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7730	11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595	3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350	3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350	3340
PassMark - G2D Mark	587	766
PassMark - G3D Mark	5929	9640
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		8.737
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		490.688
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		369

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 14	GM204
Launch date	13 Nov 2019	19 September 2014
Place in performance rating	369	371
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Price now		$407.76
Value for money (0-100)		28.59
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1178 MHz
Compute units	20
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	1664
Pixel fill rate	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s	109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	148 Watt
Transistor count	6400 million	5,200 million
CUDA cores		1664
Floating-point performance		3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature		98 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pins
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		500 Watt
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	224 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround