NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 5300M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1425 MHz vs 1250 MHz
4.7x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 85 Watt
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7821 vs 5994
Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42897 vs 29410
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9851 vs 7730
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9851 vs 7730

Specifications (specs)
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt vs 85 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7821 vs 5994
Geekbench - OpenCL	42897 vs 29410
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851 vs 7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851 vs 7730

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 855 MHz
Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 100 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
9.6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 618 vs 459
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3595 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2238
Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3595 vs 2476
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2238

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 855 MHz
Texture fill rate	100 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	618 vs 459
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3595 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 2238
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3595 vs 2476
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5300M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7821

5994

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

459

618

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42897

29410

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

7730

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3595

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9851

7730

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2476

3595

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2238

3350

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
PassMark - G3D Mark	7821	5994
PassMark - G2D Mark	459	618
Geekbench - OpenCL	42897	29410
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	157.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1934.012
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	10.833
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	136.552
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	684.333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9851	7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2476	3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2238	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9851	7730
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2476	3595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2238	3350

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Code name	TU117	Navi 14
Place in performance rating	354	355
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Launch date		13 Nov 2019
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1425 MHz	1250 MHz
Core clock speed	855 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	91.20 GFLOPS (1:32)	200 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.837 TFLOPS (2:1)	6.400 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.918 TFLOPS	3.200 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	45.60 GPixel/s	40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	91.20 GTexel/s	100 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	18 Watt	85 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	6400 million
Compute units		20
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	3.0	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	192 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)	12000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6