AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1127 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1757 MHz vs 1178 MHz
- 2343.1x more texture fill rate: 168.7 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 250x more memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42817 vs 18655
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 22 January 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1127 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1757 MHz vs 1178 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s vs 72 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42817 vs 18655 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42817 | 18655 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6082 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.733 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 792.44 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.338 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 200.825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2284 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | GM206 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 22 January 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 507 | 504 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1757 MHz | 1178 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1127 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 337.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.398 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.22 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s | 72 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,940 million |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,413 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pins |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | 112 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost |