AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
  • Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 4500 MHz
  • Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1638
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 629
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 vs 9907
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 vs 24.097
  • Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 572.795 vs 465.496
  • Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 vs 2.211
  • Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 106.848
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 June 2017 vs 1 April 2013
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
Texture fill rate 40.8 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 640
Floating-point performance 1,306 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz vs 4500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3141 vs 1638
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 vs 629
Geekbench - OpenCL 11389 vs 9907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.301 vs 24.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 572.795 vs 465.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.83 vs 2.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.706 vs 106.848

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M

  • Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 vs 26.388
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2221
  • Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2221
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.126 vs 26.388
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3702 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3349
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3702 vs 2221
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3349

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3141
1638
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
659
629
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
11389
9907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
31.301
24.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
572.795
465.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.83
2.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
26.388
38.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
162.706
106.848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2221
3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
3357
Name AMD Radeon Pro 555 AMD Radeon HD 8870M
PassMark - G3D Mark 3141 1638
PassMark - G2D Mark 659 629
Geekbench - OpenCL 11389 9907
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 31.301 24.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 572.795 465.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.83 2.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 26.388 38.126
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 162.706 106.848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2221 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4042
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2221 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 3357

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 555 AMD Radeon HD 8870M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 4.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Polaris 21 Venus
Launch date 5 June 2017 1 April 2013
Place in performance rating 712 726
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 850 MHz 725 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,306 gflops 992.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 640
Texture fill rate 40.8 GTexel / s 31 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt
Transistor count 3,000 million 1,500 million
Boost clock speed 725 MHz
Compute units 10

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large large
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 11
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 81.6 GB / s 72 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5100 MHz 4500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
HDMI 2.0