AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- Around 32% better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 92% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 1638
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 629
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11389 vs 9907
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.301 vs 24.097
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 572.795 vs 465.496
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.83 vs 2.211
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 106.848
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 1 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 992.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 vs 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 629 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 vs 9907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 vs 24.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 vs 465.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 vs 2.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 vs 106.848 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.126 vs 26.388
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 2221
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 2221
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.126 vs 26.388 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 2221 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3349 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 629 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11389 | 9907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | 24.097 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | 465.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | 2.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | 38.126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | 106.848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Venus |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 1 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 712 | 726 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 725 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Boost clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |