AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 768 vs 480
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 219 Watt
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
• 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 1900 MHz (3800 data rate)
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 476
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 162.706 vs 122.953
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3325
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3325

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1464 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 43.9 billion / sec vs 40.8 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 1,405.4 gflops vs 1,306 gflops
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3927 vs 3141
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13580 vs 11389
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.849 vs 31.301
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 736.185 vs 572.795
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.369 vs 2.83
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.08 vs 26.388
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4862 vs 4042
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3668 vs 2221
• Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4862 vs 4042
• Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3668 vs 2221

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3141 3927
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	659 476
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11389 13580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.301 36.849
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	572.795 736.185
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.83 4.369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	26.388 40.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	162.706 122.953
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3325
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4042 4862
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2221 3668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 3325

Compare specifications (specs)