AMD Radeon Pro 555 vs ATI Radeon E4690
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 555 and ATI Radeon E4690 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 555
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 40.8 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,306 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 5100 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 7.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3141 vs 405
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 347
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3302
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3302
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 1 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 vs 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3302 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E4690
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 555
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E4690
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 555 | ATI Radeon E4690 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3141 | 405 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 659 | 347 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11413 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.301 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 572.795 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 162.706 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3302 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4042 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2221 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3302 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 555 | ATI Radeon E4690 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 21 | RV730 |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 1 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 716 | 719 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,306 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 40.8 GTexel / s | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 30 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 81.6 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5100 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |