AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs AMD Radeon RX 560X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and AMD Radeon RX 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48379 vs 16401
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10296 vs 5698
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10296 vs 5698
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 669
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 3553
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 3 April 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 81.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 vs 16401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 vs 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 vs 5698 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 vs 669 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 vs 3553 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 560X
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1175 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1275 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 9.1x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4873 vs 3715
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4873 vs 3715
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1175 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4873 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4873 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 560X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon RX 560X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48379 | 16401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 5698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 4873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 4873 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 687 | 669 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9313 | 3553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | AMD Radeon RX 560X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 12 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 3 April 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 271 | 385 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon RX 500X Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 14/16 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | 20.40 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 81.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2.6 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 16 | |
Stream Processors | 896/1024 | |
Texture Units | 64 | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support |