AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
  • 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
Pipelines 2560 vs 1280
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

  • Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1030 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55772 vs 47751
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10296
  • Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10296
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 681
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10162 vs 9233
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 55772 vs 47751
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13569 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13569 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3354
PassMark - G2D Mark 750 vs 681
PassMark - G3D Mark 10162 vs 9233

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
47751
55772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10296
13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
681
750
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
9233
10162
Name AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Geekbench - OpenCL 47751 55772
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10296 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10296 13569
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 3357
PassMark - G2D Mark 681 750
PassMark - G3D Mark 9233 10162
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 178.014
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1961.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 11.169
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 109.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 787.025
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 4663

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 12 TU116
Launch date 15 Jun 2020 22 Nov 2019
Place in performance rating 276 277
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1030 MHz 1725 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.274 TFLOPS 4.416 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 1280
Pixel fill rate 65.92 GPixel/s 55.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 164.8 GTexel/s 138.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 6600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Width IGP Dual-slot
Length 9 inches (229 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 350 Watt

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 394.2 GB/s 192 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6