AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 22 Nov 2019 |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55741 vs 47735
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 vs 10296
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 vs 10296
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 681
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10167 vs 9233
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55741 vs 47735 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 vs 10296 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3354 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 681 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10167 vs 9233 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47735 | 55741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 13569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 681 | 750 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9233 | 10167 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4663 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 12 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 22 Nov 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 278 | 279 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1725 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | 55.20 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | 138.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | 192 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIATesla T4
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMDRadeon Pro 5600M vs
AMDRadeon 550
