AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 48365 vs 41946
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 687 vs 389
Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9313 vs 7569

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	15 Jun 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s vs 95.04 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2560 vs 1024
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	48365 vs 41946
PassMark - G2D Mark	687 vs 389
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313 vs 7569

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12180 vs 10296
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12180 vs 10296
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8926 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8926 vs 3715
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8062 vs 3354
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8062 vs 3354

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz vs 1030 MHz
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12180 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12180 vs 10296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8926 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8926 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8062 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8062 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

48365

41946

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10296

12180

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8926

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

8062

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3354

8062

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

687

389

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

7569

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL	48365	41946
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10296	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10296	12180
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	8926
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3354	8062
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3354	8062
PassMark - G2D Mark	687	389
PassMark - G3D Mark	9313	7569
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		151.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1844.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		10.683
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		115.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		644.054
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3667

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5600M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 12	TU117
Launch date	15 Jun 2020	2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating	271	273
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	1485 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	329.6 GFLOPS (1:16)	95.04 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	10.55 TFLOPS (2:1)	6.083 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.274 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	1024
Pixel fill rate	65.92 GPixel/s	47.52 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	164.8 GTexel/s	95.04 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	50 Watt	50 Watt
Transistor count		4700 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Width	IGP
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6