NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro 5600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 95% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 9198
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 47784
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16098 vs 10296
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16098 vs 10296
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 vs 15 Jun 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 9198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 47784 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 164.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 678 vs 497
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 678 vs 497 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 | 9198 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 497 | 678 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 | 47784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | GA106 | Navi 12 |
Launch date | 11 May 2021 | 15 Jun 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 276 | 282 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.299 TFLOPS | 5.274 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 49.68 GPixel/s | 65.92 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 82.80 GTexel/s | 164.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 12000 million | |
Compute units | 40 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 394.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) |