AMD Radeon Pro 5600M vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 1781
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 1781
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 681 vs 590
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 vs 13 September 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 1781 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 681 vs 590 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 13x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective)
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 47735
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 10296
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 10296
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10744 vs 9233
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 47735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 10296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 10296 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10744 vs 9233 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47735 | 61276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10296 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10296 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 1781 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 681 | 590 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9233 | 10744 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 12 | TU104 |
Launch date | 15 Jun 2020 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 278 | 280 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 329.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.55 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.274 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 65.92 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 164.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 394.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 770 MHz (1540 MHz effective) | 10000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 |