AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs AMD Radeon R9 370X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and AMD Radeon R9 370X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 27 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3348 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370X
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 25659 vs 17535
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 65.071 vs 48.494
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1139.703 vs 679.583
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.39 vs 3.96
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 88.44 vs 62.405
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 337.583 vs 247.728
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8393 vs 5367
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3704 vs 2495
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8393 vs 5367
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3704 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 25659 vs 17535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 65.071 vs 48.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1139.703 vs 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.39 vs 3.96 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.44 vs 62.405 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 337.583 vs 247.728 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8393 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3704 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8393 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3704 vs 2495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon R9 370X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17535 | 25659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 65.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 1139.703 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 5.39 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 88.44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 337.583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 8393 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3704 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3348 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | AMD Radeon R9 370X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | Trinidad |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 27 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 551 | 552 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2,637 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 82.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 221 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB / s |