AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 195 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 531
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 48.494 vs 46.086
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 36.463
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 99.577
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3306
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3306
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 22 March 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 195 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 531 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 vs 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 vs 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 vs 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- Around 18% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5590 vs 3678
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18376 vs 17562
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 679.583
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.645 vs 3.96
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7222 vs 5367
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 2495
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7222 vs 5367
- Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 2495
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1006 MHz vs 1004 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5080 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5590 vs 3678 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 18376 vs 17562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 vs 679.583 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.645 vs 3.96 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7222 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 2495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7222 vs 5367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 2495 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 5590 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 531 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17562 | 18376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 46.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 989.685 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 4.645 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 36.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 99.577 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 7222 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3306 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 21 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 22 March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 546 | 544 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $579.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 1006 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 195 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1058 MHz | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2048 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||