AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 846.7x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 642
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17548 vs 16715
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 62.405 vs 29.738
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 247.728 vs 231.508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 vs 20 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 768 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 90 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 6.6 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 642 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17548 vs 16715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 vs 29.738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 vs 231.508 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 1004 MHz
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5345 vs 3678
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 60.473 vs 48.494
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 758.865 vs 679.583
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.279 vs 3.96
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6803 vs 5367
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 2495
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6803 vs 5367
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 2495
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 1004 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5345 vs 3678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 vs 48.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 vs 679.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 vs 3.96 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3678 | 5345 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 | 642 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17548 | 16715 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | 60.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | 758.865 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | 4.279 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | 29.738 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 | 231.508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5367 | 6803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5367 | 6803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 | 3697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 104 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 560X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Polaris 21 | GM206 |
Launch date | 16 July 2018 | 20 August 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 550 | 551 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
Price now | $194.44 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz | 1024 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 768 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 90 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 2,940 million |
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 49.2 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pins |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
SLI options | 2x | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | 6.6 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 105.6 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |