AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 965.4x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 11536
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 7 July 2019 |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 11536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 816
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14499 vs 12613
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66234 vs 59733
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 816 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14499 vs 12613 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66234 vs 59733 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 889 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 14499 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 66234 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8500 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA |
Code name | Navi 10 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 177 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Compute units | 40 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 10.3 B |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |