AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 535
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12613 vs 12291
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 535 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 vs 12291 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1499 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 16433
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 16433
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1499 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 239.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 16433 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 535 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 12291 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59931 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 19529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 180 | 183 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1110 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 13600 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
IntelArc A530M
