AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1138 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 642.9x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 62% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 210 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 12822
- Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 12822
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 14 August 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1138 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 302.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2304
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61716 vs 53019
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2304 |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61716 vs 53019 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53019 | 61716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 12822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 828 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 153.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1722.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.901 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 126.528 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1172.788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 14 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 248 | 249 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1138 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 302.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 10300 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 402.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1572 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |