AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 440.2x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 11451
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3198
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3198
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 21 June 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s vs 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 vs 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166109 vs 64325
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1246 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1752 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 vs 64325 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64325 | 166109 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18549 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18549 | 11451 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3198 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 515 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12633 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Volta |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GV100 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 21 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 227 | 209 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1246 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 388.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.44 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.221 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 194.4 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 21,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
