AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570X and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.5x more boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 149.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 24 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) vs 1200 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 89 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27194 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 138 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Curie |
Code name | Polaris 20 | NV41 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 24 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 873 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 450 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 247.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 12 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.36 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 123.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 222 million |
Texture fill rate | 5.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |