AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1105 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 19 November 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1006 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2x 1152 vs 1792
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective)
Core clock speed | 1006 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 1152 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27258 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.396 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK104 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 19 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 856 | 859 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 247.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2x 1152 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.36 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 123.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,470 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.9 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 279 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 2x 192.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |