AMD Radeon Pro 570X vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 570X and NVIDIA Quadro K500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 570X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 6% higher memory clock speed: 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 1 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 850 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) vs 1600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K500M
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 120 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA Quadro K500M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27194 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 184 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 480 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 570X | NVIDIA Quadro K500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Polaris 20 | GK107 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 1 June 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 876 | 879 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1105 MHz | |
Compute units | 28 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 247.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.960 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.36 GPixel/s | |
Stream Processors | 123.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 1,270 million |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 13.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz (6800 MHz effective) | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |