AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD Radeon R7 A265
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and AMD Radeon R7 A265 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 7085.9x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 4.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34273 vs 6925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 9 January 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 19.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 vs 6925 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 A265
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon R7 A265 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 | 6925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 994 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD Radeon R7 A265 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Opal |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 9 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 392 | 455 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 19.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |