AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 575X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
415.1x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 375 Watt
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35084 vs 22732
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 8124
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 8124
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3458 vs 2413
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3458 vs 2413
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2226
Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2226

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 March 2019 vs 28 May 2014
Texture fill rate	140.3 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt vs 375 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	35084 vs 22732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11237 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11237 vs 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3458 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3458 vs 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

2.8x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 2048
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB

Pipelines	2x 2880 vs 2048
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

35084

22732

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11237

8124

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11237

8124

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3458

2413

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3458

2413

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2226

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

2226

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 575X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Geekbench - OpenCL	35084	22732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11237	8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11237	8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3458	2413
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3458	2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	2226
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	2226
PassMark - G3D Mark		8942
PassMark - G2D Mark		650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		309.857
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		17055

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 575X	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Kepler
Code name	Polaris 20	GK110B
Launch date	18 March 2019	28 May 2014
Place in performance rating	400	401
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,999
Price now		$1,580
Value for money (0-100)		6.46
Technical info
Compute units	32
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	280.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	4.489 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.489 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2048	2x 2880
Pixel fill rate	35.07 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	140.3 GTexel/s	338 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	120 Watt	375 Watt
Transistor count	5700 million	7,080 million
Boost clock speed		876 MHz
Core clock speed		705 MHz
CUDA cores		5760
Floating-point performance		2x 5,046 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		Two 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.6 GB/s	672 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory clock speed		7.0 GB/s
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA