AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 375 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 5214
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 658
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 109.521 vs 44.481
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.88 vs 8.536
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.984 vs 470.237
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 vs 24 April 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 375 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2x 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 vs 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 vs 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 vs 470.237 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
- 11x more texture fill rate: 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 2x 2048 vs 2304
- Around 33% better floating-point performance: 2x 4,096 gflops vs 6,175 gflops
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1984.655 vs 1206.829
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 125.504 vs 117.944
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2048 vs 2304 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,096 gflops vs 6,175 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1984.655 vs 1206.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125.504 vs 117.944 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | 5214 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 | 658 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 40271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | 44.481 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | 1984.655 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | 8.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | 125.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | 470.237 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2900 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2900 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580 | AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Malta |
Launch date | 5 June 2017 | 24 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 332 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | 2x 4,096 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 193.0 GTexel / s | 2x 128.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 375 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,700 million | 4,313 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 307 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB / s | 2x 288.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |