AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 1439.9x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6780 MHz
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 2900
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6780 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1536
- Around 37% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 729
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 7351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1536 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 943 vs 729 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 2900 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 943 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 7753 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40288 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10113 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10113 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 10 | Polaris 20 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 5 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 323 | 324 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 5,700 million |
| Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon HD 8990 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
