AMD Radeon Pro 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 580

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
2x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 540 MHz
44.7x more texture fill rate: 193.0 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
288x more pipelines: 2304 vs 8
357.3x better floating-point performance: 6,175 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
32x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 256 MB
6.8x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 1000 MHz
71.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7753 vs 108
Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 943 vs 481

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 June 2017 vs 6 November 2008
Core clock speed	1100 MHz vs 540 MHz
Texture fill rate	193.0 GTexel / s vs 4.32 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 8
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops vs 17.28 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 256 MB
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753 vs 108
PassMark - G2D Mark	943 vs 481

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7753

108

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

943

481

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 580	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
PassMark - G3D Mark	7753	108
PassMark - G2D Mark	943	481
Geekbench - OpenCL	40265
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	109.521
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1206.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	9.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	117.944
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	511.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	10113
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2900
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 580	NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Tesla
Code name	Polaris 20	G98
Launch date	5 June 2017	6 November 2008
Place in performance rating	319	345
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$129
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	540 MHz
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	17.28 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	2304	8
Texture fill rate	193.0 GTexel / s	4.32 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	25 Watt
Transistor count	5,700 million	210 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DMS-59
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	241 mm	198 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_0)	10.0
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	256 MB
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB / s	8 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6780 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR2