AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Tesla P4
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Tesla P4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- 1015.9x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3341
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3341
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 385
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 13 September 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 385 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P4
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37826 vs 35852
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3643
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3643
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8987 vs 7540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37826 vs 35852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8987 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35852 | 37826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 385 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 8987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.62 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1791.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.457 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 523.29 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11409 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Tesla P4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 13 September 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 357 | 358 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1063 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 170.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,443 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIFireGL V7700
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 970
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIATesla P4
