AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs AMD FirePro S9050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and AMD FirePro S9050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 1714.3x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 369
- Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7540 vs 4901
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 7 August 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 369 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 vs 4901 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S9050
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6260 vs 3643
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6260 vs 3643
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 13032 vs 3360
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 13032 vs 3360
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6260 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6260 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 13032 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 13032 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S9050
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD FirePro S9050 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35755 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 6260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 13032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 13032 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 369 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 4901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 68.324 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1463.376 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.491 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 344.551 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7062 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7062 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD FirePro S9050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 7 August 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 365 | 366 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 100.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 4,313 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 254 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 264 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 5500 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
