AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz
- 798.2x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35755 vs 24013
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35755 vs 24013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 551 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2304
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 3643
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 3643
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8096 vs 7540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8096 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35755 | 24013 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 551 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 8096 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 365 | 364 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
| Price now | $833.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDFirePro S9050
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 16
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon RX 5500M
