AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and AMD Radeon Pro 560X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5300 vs 3678
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26839 vs 17540
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8311 vs 5367
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8311 vs 5367
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 16 July 2018 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 vs 3678 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 vs 17540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 vs 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 vs 5367 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560X
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5080 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 711 vs 558
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2495 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 1663
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2495 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1004 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 711 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2495 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2495 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 3678 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 711 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 | 17540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 5367 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 2495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3351 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 48.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 679.583 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.96 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 62.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.728 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon Pro 560X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | Polaris 21 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 16 July 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 472 | 543 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1004 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |