AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- 3x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 18.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5020 vs 270
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 554 vs 328
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 13 March 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5020 vs 270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 vs 328 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- 4.2x more core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 100 Watt
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5020 | 270 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 554 | 328 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26775 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Vega 12 | G84 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 13 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 486 | 485 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 29 Watt |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | |
Pipelines | 32 | |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 289 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 800 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR2?, GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 |